<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quantum quandary</title>
	<link>http://mffitzgerald.com/wordpress/?p=86</link>
	<description>An occasional journal of ideas and work by Michael Fitzgerald</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 10:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Derek Slater</title>
		<link>http://mffitzgerald.com/wordpress/?p=86#comment-1379</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 17:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mffitzgerald.com/wordpress/?p=86#comment-1379</guid>
					<description>Some might argue that quantum physicists barely comprehend quantum physics. I have been reading a bit about string theory and particles and membranes and so on. Even if you don't have the mathematical basis to follow the subject matter (*points to self*), it's fun to watch the experts argue so vehemently with each other...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some might argue that quantum physicists barely comprehend quantum physics. I have been reading a bit about string theory and particles and membranes and so on. Even if you don&#8217;t have the mathematical basis to follow the subject matter (*points to self*), it&#8217;s fun to watch the experts argue so vehemently with each other&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael</title>
		<link>http://mffitzgerald.com/wordpress/?p=86#comment-1263</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 02:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mffitzgerald.com/wordpress/?p=86#comment-1263</guid>
					<description>Hi Alok,

I don't think Ward or Davies is saying that resurrection is scientifically provable. Ward was very careful to limit himself to logical possibilities, at least while speaking to my group.  I don't know what Davies thinks about the science of the resurrection; Paulson didn't raise it with him in this interview, and I don't know Davies' writings.

My theme for this post was quantum physicists and the direction of their ideas, which I accept as valid though I find them far-fetched.  But I barely comprehend even basic quantum mechanics. 

Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alok,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Ward or Davies is saying that resurrection is scientifically provable. Ward was very careful to limit himself to logical possibilities, at least while speaking to my group.  I don&#8217;t know what Davies thinks about the science of the resurrection; Paulson didn&#8217;t raise it with him in this interview, and I don&#8217;t know Davies&#8217; writings.</p>
<p>My theme for this post was quantum physicists and the direction of their ideas, which I accept as valid though I find them far-fetched.  But I barely comprehend even basic quantum mechanics. </p>
<p>Michael
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: alokmohan</title>
		<link>http://mffitzgerald.com/wordpress/?p=86#comment-1236</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 11:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mffitzgerald.com/wordpress/?p=86#comment-1236</guid>
					<description>What is central idea of this theme?Resurrection is science?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is central idea of this theme?Resurrection is science?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
